who wrote the 2025 doctrine

Vender Womder

2 min read

·

23-11-2024

1

0

Share

The 2025 Doctrine: Authorship and Ambiguity

The term "2025 Doctrine" doesn't refer to a single, formally published document with a clearly identified author. Instead, it's a shorthand description for a perceived shift in U.S. military strategy and defense planning that emerged around 2020-2021. This perceived shift emphasizes great power competition, particularly with China, and involves a reorientation of resources and priorities.

Therefore, attributing authorship to a single person or group is inaccurate. The "2025 Doctrine" is more accurately understood as a confluence of factors, including:

• Shifting Geopolitical Landscape: The rise of China as a global power and its increasingly assertive military posture is a primary driver. This shift wasn't dictated by a single individual but rather recognized across various levels of the US government and military.

• Strategic Reviews and Planning Documents: While no document is explicitly titled "2025 Doctrine," several key strategic reviews and planning documents under the Trump and Biden administrations contributed to its conceptualization. These include the National Defense Strategy, the National Security Strategy, and various internal military planning documents. These documents are authored by teams of analysts, strategists, and policymakers, not a single individual.

• Statements and Speeches by Military and Political Leaders: Public statements by senior military officials, such as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and political leaders, such as the Secretary of Defense, have articulated elements of the strategic shift often associated with the "2025 Doctrine." While these individuals shape the narrative, they are communicating and interpreting broader strategic thinking within the government.

• Media and Academic Interpretations: The term "2025 Doctrine" itself gained traction largely through media coverage and academic analysis. These interpretations synthesized various official statements, leaked documents, and observed changes in military posture to arrive at a collective understanding of this strategic shift.

Why the Ambiguity Matters:

The lack of a singular author for the "2025 Doctrine" highlights its evolution as a collective understanding and consensus rather than a top-down directive. Understanding the strategy requires examining a network of influences and perspectives, not simply tracing it back to a single source. This distributed authorship is typical of significant shifts in national security policy.

Further Research:

To understand the underpinnings of the perceived "2025 Doctrine," it's crucial to examine the following resources:

• Official Government Documents: The publicly available versions of the National Defense Strategy and National Security Strategy offer insights into the underlying strategic thinking.
• Congressional Hearings: Testimony from senior military and political leaders before Congress provides valuable context.
• Academic Analyses: Scholarly articles and think tank publications offer independent interpretations and analysis of the shift in US military strategy.

In conclusion, there is no single author of the "2025 Doctrine." It represents a complex evolution in US military thinking driven by geopolitical shifts, internal policy debates, and interpretations by both official actors and external observers. A full understanding requires analyzing a wide range of sources and perspectives.